As
Election Day draws near, candidates for elected office will be saying
and doing a great deal to get your vote. That's what elections are all
about. Unfortunately, much of what is said is wrapped up in 30-second
sound bites designed for evening network news and morning newspaper
consumption. Is it enough information for you to make an informed
decision about a candidate running for local, state or national
office? Most of the time, the answer is no.
It's up to you, the voter, to make sure that you have the answers
you need from the candidates before you arrive at the polls and cast
your vote. As a union member, you know how critical it is to elect
candidates who support a pro-working families agenda. We know all too
well what the consequences are if candidates with an anti-labor record
get into office. As the phrase goes, "Been there, done
that."
Now is the time to ask the candidates to tell you what they will
really do to address the issues confronting today's working families.
And you should not take simple rhetoric as an answer. This is the time
to hold the candidates' feet to the fire.
As you know, the issues are not simple. Many have been at the
center of political debate for years. Yet, the issues are critical to
our future.
Take comp time. For years there have been various proposals debated
in the halls of Congress to undermine a worker's right to overtime
pay. Some were masked in worker friendly terms like the "Working
Families Flexibility Act." Sounds pretty good, right? Well, while
its proponents touted this legislation as a vehicle to give workers
increased control over their working lives, the truth is that it would
have resulted in a reduced pay check and standard of living for
working families.
As a voter, when you hear the term comp time, ask the candidate
what that means to him or her. Fair overtime compensation is a basic
employee right. True flexibility can only exist when workers have a
real right to choose how they'll be compensated. While we all want
more flexibility and choice when it comes to balancing our work and
family lives, we are concerned when that means losing needed income
and worried about losing control over our schedules.
Let's look at another bill that sounds good, but you need to first
know the facts. It's the Patients' Bill of Rights. Now, this is a good
bill. But, it does depend on which bill your candidate is discussing.
In its original form as supported by President Clinton and Vice
President Gore, the bill puts health decisions in the hands of
doctors, not insurance company bureaucrats, and gives patients the
right to sue an HMO if they are denied the health care they need. The
Republicans in Congress, however, have proposed another, weaker
version which would let insurance companies make the decisions and
deny people the right to sue. So, when a candidate says "I
support the Patients' Bill of Rights," make sure you dig a little
deeper to see what they mean and learn which version he or she
supports.
You will also hear a lot in this campaign year about increasing the
minimum wage. Some will say that a raise in the minimum wage will mean
a decline in jobs. It's the same cry opponents of an increase have
made throughout this decade and yet the nation is enjoying the
strongest economy in decades. And every time there is a wage increase,
the opponents are proven wrong. According to the Economic Policy
Institute, "no evidence exists that shows teenagers or adults
without a high school education lost work as the result of the
1996-1997 minimum wage increases. Historically, analyses of the
minimum wage's impact on young workers have never shown the projected
large job loss."
The labor movement supports legislation introduced by Senator Ted
Kennedy and Representative David Bonior that would increase the
minimum wage by one dollar an hour over two years. Earlier this year,
Congress passed legislation increasing the minimum wage a paltry 33
cents an hour, and included huge tax breaks for Big Business and the
wealthy. President Clinton has threatened to veto these bills. Again,
the question to candidates is not whether they support a minimum wage
hike but rather "what bill do you support?"
As the world we live in changes and our economy becomes globalized,
it is increasingly important to demand from politicians the type of
trade policies that benefit all workers around the world, not launch a
worldwide race to the bottom in wages, benefits and workers' rights.
If you had a chance to tour, for example, a Mexico-based U.S.
manufacturer you would find a high-tech 21st Century plant with 19th
Century human conditions for Mexican workers who lack clean running
water and sewers and live in environmental disaster zones. Meanwhile,
workers in the U.S. have seen tens of thousands of good jobs disappear
as multi-national corporations wage a war of exploitation against
workers around the globe.
This can stop if we demand more from our elected officials and,
more importantly, ask the right questions. No one, including the labor
movement, is against selling our goods abroad as members of both
political parties talk about the good jobs supported by growing trade.
The real question is not if you support trade, but if you support fair
trade that demands basic worker and human rights be a part of all
trade agreements? We in the BMWE must care about globalization issues
because the day may come when the railroads will try to replace
maintenance of way workers with low-wage foreign workers as the
trucking industry has tried to do under NAFTA to our Teamsters
brothers and sisters.
Retirement security is also on the minds of working families. That
is why this issue is being talked about by politicians who want
everyone to believe they have all the answers. For BMWE members and
all railroad employees, few issues are more important than
safeguarding Railroad Retirement.
No politician will ever tell you that they are against the security of
your pension or our Social Security system. But they won't tell you
what their plan is unless you ask them. Thus, the question to
politicians isn't whether they support a secure retirement and a
strong Railroad Retirement system, but whether they will support
maintaining these crucial programs and will oppose risky privatization
schemes.
These are just some of the important issues that need to be
addressed by candidates for office between now and Election Day. Now's
the time to question the candidates and learn more about where they
stand on questions facing working families. And, come November 7th,
make sure you use what you have learned and go to the polls and vote. |