Railroad Retirement Update
On March 21 the Railroad Retirement and Survivors' Improvement Act
of 2001 was introduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 1140
which replaced H.R. 180 which was introduced by Congressman Bud
Shuster in early January. Shuster's sudden retirement a few days later
left H.R. 180 without a major sponsor and the Rail Labor coalition
supporting the measure felt it would improve the legislation's chances
for passage if it were re-introduced.
The bipartisan leadership of the House Transportation &
Infrastructure Committee which re- introduced the legislation included
Committee Chairman Don Young (R-AK), Ranking Member James Oberstar
(D-MN) and Jack Quinn (R-NY), Chairman of the Subcommittee on
Railroads.
As this JOURNAL goes to press, H.R. 1140 has 280 co-sponsors. At
the close of business on April 4, the House adjourned for the
"Spring District Work Period" and were scheduled to return
in session April 23.
Late on April 4, the action moved to the Senate, where the
jointly-sponsored bill (S. 697) was introduced by Senators Orrin Hatch
(R-UT) and Max Baucus (D-MT). The next morning the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers reported that the bill already had 34
co-sponsors. As this JOURNAL goes to press, S. 697 has 40 co-sponsors.
The Senators left Capitol Hill for Easter Recess on April 6 and
were not scheduled to return until April 23.
New Southwest Region Grand Lodge Officers
On April 6 E. R. "Richard" Spears was elected as
Southwest Region Vice President to fill the vacancy created by the
untimely death of Larry Borden on February 5. Bill R. Palmer was
elected to succeed Spears as Executive Board Member from the region.
Spears has been a member of the BMWE since 1966 when he went to
work for the Frisco (now BNSF) railroad as a trackman. He served in a
number of BMWE positions prior to his election as general chairman of
the Frisco System Federation in 1979, which made him the senior
general chairman in the BMWE at the time of his election as vice
president.
Palmer joined the BMWE in 1980 after going to work for the Missouri
Pacific as a trackman. He was elected as general chairman of the
Missouri Pacific System Federation in 1994 and will continue to serve
in that position in addition to his Grand Lodge office.
Rail Labor Criticizes ARC Amtrak Report
"Today, the congressionally-created Amtrak Reform Council
issued yet another disappointing report about the future of Amtrak and
national passenger rail service in this country," said Ed
Dubroski, Chairman of the Rail Labor Division of the AFL-CIO
Transportation Trades Department on March 20.
"ARC had a chance to make a clear, bold show of support for
Amtrak, but instead offered up a complicated series of recommendations
that further underscore ARC's anti-Amtrak bias.
"ARC could have issued a rallying cry for making our national
passenger rail service a long-term success but instead missed another
opportunity to convince the American people that it performs a worthy
function. After reviewing ARC's latest report, we deeply regret that
American taxpayer dollars were wasted on the work of this misguided
panel and vow to continue our effort to zero out federal funding for
this unnecessary oversight panel.
"ARC has rolled out a murky series of options and rationales
for its ideological agenda, when it should have called on Congress and
the President to fully fund Amtrak and give it a real chance to be
viable. Then — and only then — can responsible policy leaders
examine options for Amtrak into the future. The restructuring
proposals put forth in the report are radical, unnecessary and could
cause more harm than good to the cause of intercity rail passenger
service.
"One investment measure that has wide bipartisan support is
the High Speed Rail Investment act. We had hoped that ARC would have
realized the innovation behind this legislation and believe the
Council missed an opportunity by failing to join in support of this
bill.
"For all the global jet-setting ARC members did at taxpayers'
expense, you would think they would have noticed that no nation in the
world allows its intercity passenger rail service to wither on the
vine. Every nation subsidizes passenger rail to ensure it can deliver
first class transportation services.
"From their globe-trotting journeys, we would have hoped that
ARC members understand that other countries, particularly England, are
reeling from the dire consequences of privatization, including the
degradation of safety and service. Instead, ARC would steer America
down that road as well.
"Clearly, Amtrak and its 20,000 employees are at a crossroads.
Long term and sustainable financing, not ideologically driven
proposals to break up Amtrak, will ensure a strong and viable national
passenger rail system. The ARC should heed that call or cease to
exist."
Social Security and Medicare Reports Contradict Bush Positions
The social security system is stronger than ever, said the Alliance
for Retired Americans in a news release issued March 19. The ARA is a
nationwide organization of more than two million union retirees,
members of the former National Council of Senior Citizens and other
older and retired Americans working together to make their voices
heard in the laws, policies, politics and institutions that shape our
lives.
ARA said last year's Social Security Trustees Report estimated that
social security would have sufficient funds to remain financially
sound through the year 2037. Because of the strong economy of the last
eight years, that date has now been moved up to 2038 (2040 for the
retirement and survivors program), after which social security will
still have 73 percent of the revenues needed to pay benefits. Under
one of the Trustees' projections, very small changes in economic and
population estimates would mean that social security would remain
solvent for the entire 75-year projection period.
The announcement of these findings on March 19 by the Social
Security Board of Trustees, including Bush appointees (the Secretaries
of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services), exposes the
fallacies of the Bush Administration's claims that social security is
in crisis and needs to be "saved" by turning social security
over to Wall Street. The recent behavior of the stock market also
dramatically demonstrates how unwise it would be to divert social
security contributions into high-risk stock investments. If any
changes in social security's financing are needed, they would be minor
and we have almost 40 years to decide what they would be, ARA said.
The Bush Administration has also been misleading the public by
talking about Medicare having a "surplus" they can use to
reduce taxes for the rich. The so-called "surplus" is
actually a reserve needed to guarantee future Medicare benefits. The
Medicare Trustees report shows that in truth Medicare faces a deficit
by 2029. It is irresponsible for the Bush Administration to include
the Medicare Trust Fund reserves in the calculations they use to
justify their bloated tax cut for the wealthiest part of the
population. Spending the Medicare Trust Fund reserves on help-the-rich
tax cuts, as the Bush Administration wants to do, would not only
cripple the present Medicare program but make it impossible to add
desperately needed prescription drug coverage for America's senior
citizens.
The Alliance for Retired Americans adamantly rejects the Bush
Administration's plan to rob the Social Security and Medicare Trust
Funds at the expense of working people's retirement and health
security. Social Security must remain America's foundation for
financial security, and Medicare must be improved by the immediate
addition of prescription drug coverage.
Campaign Finance Reform Bill
At a time when workers' voices are being drowned out in the
political arena more than ever by big business and millionaire
contributors, the AFL-CIO and its affiliate unions commended members
of the United States Senate who voted the evening of March 21 to
defeat the Hatch amendment attached to the McCain-Feingold campaign
finance reform bill earlier that day. This amendment was an extreme
attempt to silence the voice of working families and knock them out of
the political arena altogether.
The anti-worker Hatch amendment called "paycheck parity"
would prohibit unions from collecting any membership dues or fees from
any union-represented employee who has not filled out a form
authorizing his/her union's political activities. As a result, this
amendment would impose substantial barriers to union collection of
dues or fees — even for collective bargaining purposes.
Although the amendment purports to forbid corporations from
spending their general treasury funds for political activities if they
fail to get the authorization of individual shareholders, it would
still allow them to retain money that would have otherwise been spent
on political activity in their general treasuries. As a result, under
this amendment, corporations would still be able to make the same
amount of political expenditures they make now simply by changing
their internal accounting practices.
The Hatch amendment also would require duplicative and burdensome
union reporting, but only very limited corporate reporting. Under the
Hatch amendment, corporations would be required to report only on
expenditures from their own general treasuries and from the general
treasuries of their subsidiaries.
Unions, however, would be required to report on expenditures from
all of their affiliates. For example, a local union would be required
to report on expenditures by its national union and the national union
would be required to report on the local union, even though neither
the local nor the national unions have control over the others'
financial records.
As additional amendments are added to McCain-Feingold, the AFL-CIO
said it hoped that members of the U.S. Senate stand firm against any
poison pill dubbed "paycheck protection" that not only
undermines union democracy, but deters the growing participation of
working families in the political process. |