It seems like only yesterday that we were talking about the
"Y2K bug" and the beginning of the new millennium. And, now,
the first year of the 21st century is drawing to a close - and what a
year it has been.
If I had to pick a slogan to describe the year 2000, it would be a
phrase we heard quite often this year - "too close to call."
Are working men and women stronger today than we were last year? You
betcha. Will we be better off next year with a new Congress and
President? Too close to call.
As I am writing this to you, our nation does not know who its next
President will be. And the outcome is crucial to the interests of
working families. Al Gore campaigned on a working families agenda
including supporting the right for a free and independent voice at
work. A George Bush Administration means the possibility of a tougher
fight to uphold and strengthen the advancements the labor movement has
made.
And what about the new Congress? While Democrats made gains in the
House of Representatives and the Senate, the final tally fell short of
them regaining control in either of these bodies. The good news is
that with neither party possessing an overwhelming majority in either
body, we may have a real chance of seeing Democrats and Republicans
coming together in a bipartisan fashion to move forward on important
issues. The bad news is that we could also witness the opposite effect
- years of partisan bickering and a real stalemate on issues. Again,
it's simply too close to call.
However, partisan fighting aside, what is not too close to call is
whether union members made a difference in this election cycle. The
answer to this question is a resounding YES. According to a national
survey of union members conducted by the independent polling firm
Peter Hart Research Associates, union households made up a record high
26 percent of voters in the 2000 elections. This figure is
particularly impressive when you take into account that in the 1992
presidential election, only 19 percent of all voters were from union
households.
This high turnout rate among members of union households played a
pivotal role in many states including Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Wisconsin and Washington. Union households voted overwhelmingly in
favor of the Gore-Lieberman ticket by a margin of 63 percent to 32
percent and mobilized in record numbers around key congressional and
state elections. Two "paycheck deception" ballot initiatives
that attacked the voice of working families in Oregon were defeated,
as were phony school voucher initiatives in Michigan and California.
And, in critical U.S. Senate races such as the contest in Michigan,
a tidal wave of support from working families propelled Representative
Debbie Stabenow in her race to unseat railroad industry supported
incumbent Senator Spencer Abraham. No doubt Senator Abraham's anti-
worker stance proved his demise. In Michigan, 43 percent of all voters
were members of union households! The story of working people voting
in record numbers is the same in races in New York, New Jersey,
California, Missouri, Florida, West Virginia and across the country.
In Missouri, Jean Carnahan lost the non-union household vote by 6%,
but was elected to the Senate because union households voted for her
by an 18% margin. Similarly, in West Virginia, Bob Wise lost the
non-union household vote by 5%, but was elected governor on the
strength of a 35% margin among union households.
While certainly not all labor-supported candidates won their
elections, we cannot dispute the fact that the labor movement's
grassroots mobilization made the difference in 2000 and will continue
to do so in future elections. We should be proud of the unprecedented
field activities this year by hard working union members.
The "Labor 2000" program, the labor movement's largest
ever, added 2.3 million people in union households to the voter rolls
- up from 500,000 added in 1998. More than 1,000 Labor 2000
coordinators, up from 400 in 1998, trained and organized hundreds of
thousands of union volunteers to help educate union members about the
candidates and work on getting out the vote. And in the final weeks of
the campaign, an additional 500 coordinators joined the effort. Labor
2000 activists made eight million personal phone calls and sent out 12
million pieces of mail. And for the first time ever, transportation
unions including the BMWE sent out thousands of educational pieces
produced by the AFL-CIO Transportation Trades Department targeting
rail and other transportation worker issues. All of this is in
addition to the impressive phone bank and mailing efforts conducted by
individual union affiliates and state and local labor federations. In
total, more than nine out of ten union members received information
about the election directly from the labor movement.
Unions also engaged in some innovative activities to get out the
vote. Union members mobilized on-line - sending out 60,000 e-vote
cards to friends and families encouraging them to vote and downloading
3.5 million leaflets from the AFL-CIO's website to distribute in work
sites and neighborhoods. The AFL-CIO's "Working Women Vote"
program brought together more than three million working women in
forums and roundtable discussions and registered tens of thousands to
vote through "ironing board brigades" at work sites and in
neighborhoods across the country. And in the final weeks of the
election, Labor 2000 conducted a "People Powered" bus tour
rolling through 25 cities in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan,
Washington, West Virginia and Oregon.
Perhaps AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said it best right after
Election Day, "No other group in America has built a long-lasting
structure that can turn out hundreds of thousands of activists in
every township in the U.S. ... We've built a solidarity and culture of
mobilization that will last."
And, last it must. In an earlier column I wrote about how one vote
can make a difference. Little did I know how great a significance that
statement would have in this year's election! If any American doubts
that their vote counts, this year should set their minds straight.
Every vote does count - and your vote can make a difference. Your vote
can propel a candidate from "too close to call" to an
elected office.
Yes, the year 2000 might be remembered as the year when things were
"too close to call." It was definitely a year of excitement
and confusion. As we look towards 2001, we must remember that the BMWE
has a proud tradition of working with members of both political
parties on issues important to our members. We must look at 2001 as a
year of opportunity and build upon the solidarity that we created this
year. The labor movement has shown that we have a strong and loud
voice. Let's use that voice to make 2001 a year of activism and
progress for working men and women nationwide. |