On January 23, 2001 the Surface
Transportation Board issued a decision rejecting in total the BMWE’s
petition to have set aside the decision of arbitrator William E.
Fredenberger, Jr. in the Conrail carve-up case.
In July 1998, the STB, with only two of three Congressionally
appointed members sitting, approved the carve-up of Conrail by CSX and
Norfolk Southern. One of the three slots was vacant because the term
of Jake Simmons ended December 31, 1996 and he was not replaced.
At that time, the second of the three, Gus Owen, was a holdover
whose term had also expired and whose serious ethical problems
directly related to his tenure at the Board prevented his
reappointment. The third member (and today still chairman), Linda
Morgan, is called the mother of the Conrail carve-up because she
publicly suggested that the friendly merger of Conrail and CSX would
be disapproved by the STB.
Because Rail Labor knew that Morgan and Owen looked for every
mechanism possible to give the railroads the upper hand when
implementing mergers, nearly mandating that the railroads abrogate
collective bargaining agreements or portions of them, most rail unions
worked hard to reach voluntary agreements with CSX and NS, the two
acquiring railroads.
The BMWE was unable to reach agreement because among other things,
the railroads were demanding huge seniority districts through
combining and realigning existing districts and lower long term wages
for many. The offers made were so severe that the BMWE, which is more
adversely affected by the types of changes the STB allows, rejected
them.
Under the law which governs these kinds of mergers, the railroads
have a right to force the union into binding arbitration if they do
not reach agreement during negotiations. So in mid-November 1998, CSX,
NS and Conrail served notice on BMWE and several other crafts that
they wanted arbitration.
The arbitrations were conducted December 15 - 19, 1998 and heard by
Arbitrator William E. Fredenberger, Jr. Fredenberger was appointed by
the National Mediation Board despite BMWE’s strenuous objections.
The BMWE had instead proposed that the NMB furnish a list of seven
arbitrators from which the union and the carriers would alternately
strike names. "If we had been given such a list and Fredenberger’s
name had been on it, we would have struck him," said BMWE
President Mac A. Fleming at the time, "because we do not consider
him a fair or impartial arbitrator in this area."
On January 14, 1999, Fredenberger issued his decision and gave the
carriers everything they wanted; actually imposing the carriers’
proposal word for word.
"This unjust and mean-spirited decision," said President
Fleming, "works a terrible hardship on BMWE members and appears
motivated by anti-union animus in the arbitrator’s assault on
seniority district size and contracting."
The BMWE (and the International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers) appealed Fredenberger’s decision to the STB on
February 12, 1999. The appeals were dismissed by a decision served on
May 18, 1999, at the unions’ request.
The BMWE’s request followed ratification of implementing
agreements resulting from negotiations held following the disastrous
Fredenberger award. While the award had placed BMWE bargainers in an
extremely difficult position from which to negotiate, some
improvements were won. BMWE members on CSX ratified the implementing
agreement by a 9-1 margin (counted April 26, 1999) and on the former
Conrail by a 4-1 margin (counted May 3, 1999).
On June 1, 1999, NS and CSX began to operate Conrail’s routes and
assets, in what Barron’s called "the most complicated
Transaction in U.S. railroad history, covering 45,000 miles of tracks
and 72,789 workers."
On July 1, 1999, the very same William E. Fredenberger, Jr., who
gave the railroads all the goodies in the Conrail carve-up, pleaded
guilty to the felony charges of federal income tax evasion and
possible fraud. His sentence:
five months in a federal penitentiary;
12 more months’ probation, with five of these months on
"electronic home monitoring";
financial activities monitored and/or approved by his probation
officer;
pay federal income taxes for 1993 thru 1996
pay $58,272 restitution to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
BMWE maintained that Fredenberger had shown utter disregard for the
law when he stole from the government. Clearly, such a person would
not feel bound by law in deciding a case in New York Dock arbitration.
After several months of evaluation and preparation, the BMWE filed
a petition with the STB on December 27, 1999, asking that Fredenberger’s
Award be set aside because it was "the product of unfair and
prejudicial proceedings" and because Fredenberger was an agent of
the Board and thus, a federal employee when he was involved in the
arbitration, his conviction violated the duties imposed on public
employees. Such a violation requires that decisions made after the
violation occurred be considered void.
On January 23, 2001, the STB ordered that the BMWE’s petition was
denied. The STB decided that Fredenberger was not an agent of the
Board, that the BMWE did not show that his tax violation created a
bias against BMWE pertaining to the arbitration, and that by
withdrawing its appeal (which occurred before the BMWE became
aware of Fredenberger’s criminal activities), BMWE had no further
right of appeal.
"Under the STB’s view of the world, any sort of grifter,
thief or felon could sit as a New York Dock arbitrator. If an affected
party found out about the arbitrator’s concealed past after he
rendered a decision, the aggrieved party has no remedy
whatsoever," said BMWE President Fleming.
In writing to BMWE officers of plans to appeal the STB’s decision
to the Court of Appeals, President Fleming said, "with this sort
of cavalier disregard for the integrity of the New York Dock
process, this STB has demonstrated that it has utter disregard for the
rights of employees in the context of a Board-approved transaction.
... Clearly, rail labor can never succeed on the merits where the
forum deprives us of due process. We must fight to have those due
process rights which should be unquestioned in our democracy."
|